Nobody wrote down why you win
The CRM says closed lost, 150k, Q3. It never says you were the second choice, or that the champion was reorganised two weeks before signature.
One governed layer holds your sales method, your decisions and what every deal taught you.
Your sellers and your AI agents read it before they act, and a person approves every change.
Thursday morning
Last night produced 7 proposals
Add "we already use Copilot" to the discovery objections
4 lost deals · 3 callsTwo discount policies disagree on the ceiling for annual deals
Pricing doc v2 · Slack thread"Brightwell signs by end of Q4", said on 2026-09-17
Checked against the CRM after 14 daysNorthwind chose us second last year: the champion was reorganised two weeks before signature.1
On the last call the CFO asked for a pilot under 20k.2
Your method: confirm the budget owner before the demo.3
Written to the deal record
gaja is the context and governance layer for B2B sales teams: it keeps how your company sells, the decisions you took and what each deal taught you, and hands every seller and every agent what the task in front of them needs. Every line carries the source it came from, and nothing becomes trusted memory until a person says yes.
What your company knows about selling sits in people's heads, old threads and six tools that disagree. Each agent rebuilds it from scratch, works alone, and forgets what it learned.
The CRM says closed lost, 150k, Q3. It never says you were the second choice, or that the champion was reorganised two weeks before signature.
Before a call someone opens six tabs and rebuilds what the company already knows about the account. Next week somebody else does it again.
What the top performer knows reaches nobody else. Fifty agents can work for a year and leave almost nothing behind for the next one.
A remark in a thread weighs as much as a decision from the CEO, and nobody can say who changed a rule, or when.
Your method, your decisions and what every deal taught you, handed to each seller and each agent when a task needs them.
Skill · meeting prep
Prepare my call with Northwind, Thursday at 10:00
What the brain handed over
Where each line comes from
The method, the decisions and the lessons from your deals, kept in one live version, turned into skills, and read by every seller and every agent.
Each truth has one home. When it changes, the old version is marked superseded instead of deleted, and two pages that disagree are flagged for a person.
The way your top seller prepares a call, written as steps every seller and every agent runs the same way. Built in the skill builder and saved as a file you can read.
Which agent read which page, who approved which change, and what an agent could not reach because it sits outside its scope.
What it learns from them: a pattern across calls, a decision taken on a call, a correction a real outcome forced on the method. The records stay in your CRM, your call recorder and your inbox.
A procedure written once, such as the way your best seller prepares a call, that every seller and every agent runs the same way against the brain.
You do. Access is set per source, for people and for agents, and an agent reads only the sources you opened to it.
A lesson from one call becomes the starting point of the next one, for every seller and every agent, as soon as a person approves it.
An objection raised on one call reaches the whole team once it is approved, with the call it came from attached.
The brief sits in the deal record and the corrected field sits in the CRM. Nobody opens another tool to use it.
Won and lost deals correct the method. Each version keeps the evidence that changed it, and the one before stays readable, marked superseded.
Access is set per source. Every claim carries where it came from and how much it weighs, and every change to the method carries the name of who approved it.
Your agents ask the brain before they act and get back context they can check: short, scoped to them, and sourced line by line.
Join the waitlistAn agent asks with an account and a task, and receives the few lines that bear on it.
Each agent reads the sources you opened to it, and nothing outside them.
Every item comes back with where it came from and how much it weighs.
Agents read what a person approved. What the night proposed waits in the queue.
MCP is the open protocol AI tools use to reach context outside themselves. Any agent that speaks it reads gaja, each one with the scope you set.
The records stay in your CRM, your call recorder and your inbox. The brain hands an agent the conclusions its task needs, so each session starts short and every model you use reads the same method.
Without the brain, every session
Example→ request get_context( account: "Northwind", task: "first email after the pilot request" ) ← context, 4 items segment mid-market SaaS, passes the ICP gate [method] last_call CFO asked for a pilot under 20k [call 09-24] objection "we already use Copilot" [learning] rule no discount before the budget owner [method]
The agent receives four sourced lines instead of reloading transcripts and threads every time it starts.
Your team keeps its subscriptions. Those tools read the brain through MCP.
The method and the lessons live in the brain, outside any one model's memory, so the next model starts from them.
Coming soon
Coming soon
Coming soon
/ Now onboarding design partners
We map your method once, connect your tools, and your agents read it from day one. Leave your email and we will write to you.
No. Your CRM stays the system of record. The brain reads from it, interprets records with your shared definitions, and writes approved updates back.
Connecting documents gives an agent access. It does not tell the agent which version is current, which decisions are approved, what it may change, or what the last deal taught. The brain adds that layer.
A wiki holds pages people read. The brain holds the method, the decisions and the learning as knowledge agents act on, every claim traceable to its source and updated through approvals when deals bring new evidence.
Outcomes across deals reveal a recurring objection or challenge an assumption in your ICP. The learning loop brings that evidence forward for review, and only an approved change enters the shared foundation.
You do. Access is defined per source, and every change to the method goes through the person you name as brain manager.
A summary of each call and email, with what was extracted from it. The recording and the full text stay in the tools where they were created.